The 2007 economy - a pretty good year
2007 was a good year, economically. If you only watched the television business reporters, you probably wouldn’t know that, though. “War on the middle class,” bursting bubbles, hollow growth, etc.
… expectations that the housing crisis would trigger a collapse of US consumption and employment have, so far, proved wide of the mark. Second, and this is easy to lose sight of, shares and house prices have ended this year considerably higher than they began, despite all the horror stories.
In America, the Dow Jones is 7 per cent higher than 12 months ago, having hit a record as recently as October 9. The FTSE 100 is up 5 per cent and Germany’s DAX has gained no less than 23 per cent and is near its all-time high, having fully recovered the losses of July and August. In Asia, stock markets are all far above levels before the credit crisis, with Hong Kong up 40 per cent on the year and Shanghai up 70 per cent. Only in Japan have asset prices substantially fallen, hardly surprising considering the renewed incompetence of the country’s economic and political management since Junichiro Koizumi resigned as prime minister in 2006.
Property markets, too, have faired much better that one might imagine, at least outside America. Last week, Nationwide said its house-price index fell for a second consecutive month in December and most analysts (including me) expect the market to get a lot worse. But it’s the strength, not weakness, of house prices in 2007 that is most remarkable. Nationwide’s figure is 5 per cent higher than a year ago, even after the recent falls. In London, where prices are falling more steeply than in the rest of the country – and are likely to fall faster in the year ahead – the average house price is still about 10 per cent up on the year.
(bold-facing mine)
The Mrs. Swanky had a professor in her MBA program who once said that if everyone turned off the cable news for three weeks, world economies would respond with unprecedented growth.




January 2nd, 2008 at 16:30 EST
Mrs. Swanky’s prof is very wise. If I had spent 2007 listening to Matt Lauer or the talking heads at CNN I should have gone broke back in July. I’m in real estate so, as every knows, I should be starving. Oh well, I guess I won’t have to vote for Hillary for heath care after all. *phew*
January 3rd, 2008 at 22:06 EST
I don’t think things are THAT rosy though. The WSJ is trending in the bearish direction b/c of energy, the deficit, the resulting worthless dollar, and other issues (like a D presidency and a D congress). They *do* point out strengths, as is done here, but they also address weaknesses; I think we need to be cognizant of the very real problems out there (as opposed to the sound bite pseudo-problems that the media cooks up).